Removing Qualifiers from NameID

[Brandon McKean]

I don't blame you, honestly it's the first time I was asked by a vendor 
to try removing that, something I'd argue shouldn't be needed in the 
first place.

But, you know how it goes. Rather than just using Shibboleth themselves 
they must reinvent the wheel, badly.

-- 
Brandon McKean
IT / Systems
Linux Administrator
(540)568-4235

On 03/15/2017 03:01 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> (That wasn't me disagreeing, BTW, I don't have an answer but it's one of the problems shifting from having a configuration syntax that inherently defines all the possible options, and a model of supporting direct configuration of any Java class.)
>
> Arguably I guess what's needed is just documenting the highlights, which is what I've tried to do in other cases, it's just time consuming (and I wouldn't have considered this case common enough to call out).
>
> -- Scott
>
> On 3/15/17, 2:56 PM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/17, 2:50 PM, "users on behalf of Christopher Bongaarts" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of cab at umn.edu> wrote:
>
>> It would be great if someone could "translate" options currently only in
>> the javadocs into actual property tables in the Wiki documentation.
> The problem is maintaining it, it would be non-viable unless it was automated.
>
> I suspect the better investment in time is adjusting the javadoc generation options or CSS to produce something more useful for people.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
>