NameID without explicit Format

[Robert Lowe]

> >I'm looking at SAML 2.0 Core, 2.2.2 Complex Type NameIDType, line 455:
>
> It was corrected by an errata. If you're looking at a non-redlined version
> of any SAML spec, you're wasting your time, they're all completely out of
> date due to so many errata.
>
> The constant is "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified"
>

Peter, Scott, got it, thanks.

Just curious, does anyone have a canonical link for such a “redlined spec?”

“The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from.”
:-)

-- 
Best regards,

Robert Lowe
http://crepuscular.rmlowe.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20160520/44495fce/attachment.html>