NameID without explicit Format

Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at
Thu May 19 11:45:10 EDT 2016

On 5/19/16, 10:34 AM, "users on behalf of Robert Lowe" <users-bounces at on behalf of robertmlowe at> wrote:

>Scott, you mean the URI?


>I'm looking at SAML 2.0 Core, 2.2.2 Complex Type NameIDType, line 455:

It was corrected by an errata. If you're looking at a non-redlined version of any SAML spec, you're wasting your time, they're all completely out of date due to so many errata.

The constant is "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified"

-- Scott

More information about the users mailing list