delegation in IDP3

[Brent Putman]

On 6/9/16 3:59 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> Ok. I just didn't remember discussing it, but I figured I would have raised a question about it. 

Before I really did any delegation config parser work, I remember
bringing it up, as "do we want to support the legacy schema, and if so,
in the old extension namespace or the standard one"?.  Then when I was
in there, I saw we had in fact already shipped the schema with what Chad
had done, making my question moot.  So I just went with it.


> It seems very odd since it's a change in a format that was only supported to avoid having to make changes...

I take your point.

>
> Leaving that aside, I don't know yet why I'm so confused but the namespace handlers don't make sense to me right now. I would guess it's got something to do with the whole xsi:type mess and I must not have realized that we changed how we handled all that. Either way, the code at present needs some clarification I think.

I responded in the issue.  Aside from the double registration in the 2
namespace handlers, I also don't really understand how the Liberty SSOS
one is actually working in the tests, since it's only registered in the
nominally "wrong" one.

>
> And then there's the issue the OP is seeing to start with...

I think that is simply because it's not registered in the namespace
handler which corresponds to the (correct) namespace the OP is using. 
That is the bug I believe (the mystery passing tests notwithstanding).
Hoping Rod can settle things.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20160609/e508ba75/attachment-0001.html>