Benchmarking Shibboleth IdP/Terracotta

[Manuel Haim]

Hari,

in the past months, we have been evaluating an IdP 2.3 with Terracotta
3.5.1 (both in a 2-nodes-cluster of KVM-virtualized Debian GNU/Linux
machines, each node with 4x QEMU Virtual CPU @2.5GHz, 4GB RAM, 1GB Swap)
using the Grinder, and got about 20 logins per second. Without
Terracotta it was about 60 logins per second. But this is just my two
cents - we are also still looking for performance tests of other IdP
users. Maybe performance is getting better if you manage to disable
Terracotta's persistent disk cache?

You may also find some (not very recent) performance results by
searching the mailing lists for words like "throughput" or "performance" at
http://groups.google.com/group/shibboleth-users/
http://groups.google.com/group/shibboleth-dev/

-Manuel


Am 01.08.2011 04:04, schrieb Mailvaganam, Hari:
> Hi:
>
> Has anyone published results on load testing Shibboleth IdP (with
> Terracotta clustering)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hari
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20110801/faca5686/attachment.html