<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hari,<br>
<br>
in the past months, we have been evaluating an IdP 2.3 with
Terracotta 3.5.1 (both in a 2-nodes-cluster of KVM-virtualized
Debian GNU/Linux machines, each node with 4x QEMU Virtual CPU
@2.5GHz, 4GB RAM, 1GB Swap) using the Grinder, and got about 20
logins per second. Without Terracotta it was about 60 logins per
second. But this is just my two cents - we are also still looking
for performance tests of other IdP users. Maybe performance is
getting better if you manage to disable Terracotta's persistent disk
cache?<br>
<br>
You may also find some (not very recent) performance results by
searching the mailing lists for words like "throughput" or
"performance" at<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://groups.google.com/group/shibboleth-users/">http://groups.google.com/group/shibboleth-users/</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://groups.google.com/group/shibboleth-dev/">http://groups.google.com/group/shibboleth-dev/</a><br>
<br>
-Manuel<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 01.08.2011 04:04, schrieb Mailvaganam, Hari:
<blockquote
cite="mid:EC0CBF4FEE159740B93D387CA8E3018665C9185D@S-ITSV-MBX01P.ead.ubc.ca"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" id="owaParaStyle"></style>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Tahoma; color: rgb(0, 0,
0); font-size: 10pt;">Hi:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Has anyone published results on load testing Shibboleth IdP
(with Terracotta clustering)?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Hari</div>
</div>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net">users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>