[ot] Quartz ?

[Brent Putman]

On 3/11/15 5:21 PM, Brent Putman wrote:
>
>  I'd say we just wait until v4, v5,
> etc.

Btw, that's even assuming we did use Quartz at all.  There's also the
newer native Java executor service pool type of approach.  Quartz might
be overkill for this honestly, unless we really do want to schedule
certain maintenance things to run in a declarative way.  Most (all?) of
our usage is the component instance-specific background task, and for
that I honestly don't know whether Quartz is the best fit.  Need to
think about it more.  Maybe it has applicability for the reloadable
service stuff, not sure.