Jetty deployment

[Ian Young]

On 16 Sep 2014, at 17:54, Rod Widdowson <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

> OTOH I have a feeling that the UK federation (who are probably
> a major consumer) still has a grotesque overhang of SAML1 only SPs and I
> don't see that number dropping as fast as anyone would like.
> 
> Ian?

UKf has 82 SPs without SAML 2 support, which is about 8.2%. It's getting slowly better, as the team have been pressing for uprades for some time. But it's not dropping as fast as we'd like, no.

Something like 8 of those are (we think) Shibboleth 1.3, another 15 or so are Shibboleth 2.x deployments which for one reason or another have chosen not to advertise SAML 2 capability. The rest are all non-Shibboleth systems, mostly older OpenAthens SP at a handful of large publishers. Unfortunately, that's a pretty "stable" market segment and additionally a primary use case for the UKf. Very few UKf IdPs can get away without back-channel support until that deployed base turns over.

	-- Ian



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5943 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140916/ae5cb5b1/attachment.bin