Jetty deployment

[Tom Scavo]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Ian Young <ian at iay.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On 16 Sep 2014, at 17:54, Rod Widdowson <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> OTOH I have a feeling that the UK federation (who are probably
>> a major consumer) still has a grotesque overhang of SAML1 only SPs and I
>> don't see that number dropping as fast as anyone would like.
>>
>> Ian?
>
> UKf has 82 SPs without SAML 2 support, which is about 8.2%.

FWIW, 1817/1866 = 97% of SPs in the InC Federation support SAML2.

I'd love to see back-channel disabled by default. Most new IdP
deployments don't need it (and from a deployer's perspective,
back-channel is costly). As we continue to traverse the long-tail of
IdP deployment, I think we'll find that the majority of IdP
deployments do just fine on SAML2 only.

Tom