a note about removing the "consent" flow directory

[Tom Zeller]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> On 10/20/14, 9:28 PM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:
>> Personally, I like post-authn
>>because it makes it obvious when those flows are called. Maybe we
>>would never have pre-authn flows, but I guess my thought is that we
>>could have interceptor flows called at more than one point in an SSO
>>flow. It's not a strong opinion.
>
> Agree there might be others, but I don't think the flows have to be named
> that way necessarily, even if we use that name as the bean ID for the list
> of flows to actually inject for use at that particular spot.
>
> But I don't care that much, just didn't think it was that great a name
> when I suggested it.

Okay, I should rename "post-authn" to ... "intercept" ? And
"ProfileInterceptor*" to "ProfileIntercept*" ? Does that seem right ?