a note about removing the "consent" flow directory

[Cantor, Scott]

On 10/20/14, 9:28 PM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:
>
>Well, besides post-authn, is there another place in an SSO flow that
>would be commonly called out to ?

Mainly error handling, locked accounts and such, the ones I already
stubbed out some examples for.

> Personally, I like post-authn
>because it makes it obvious when those flows are called. Maybe we
>would never have pre-authn flows, but I guess my thought is that we
>could have interceptor flows called at more than one point in an SSO
>flow. It's not a strong opinion.

Agree there might be others, but I don't think the flows have to be named
that way necessarily, even if we use that name as the bean ID for the list
of flows to actually inject for use at that particular spot.

But I don't care that much, just didn't think it was that great a name
when I suggested it.

-- Scott