a note about removing the "consent" flow directory

[Tom Zeller]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> On 10/20/14, 7:39 PM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:
>
>>As a follow up to last Friday's dev call where we talked about making
>>the consent flows abstract and moving them to system/ in order to make
>>upgrades easier, I think I'm going to remove the "consent" directory
>>from the consent flows, so that the flow IDs will be
>>
>> post-authn/terms-of-use
>> post-authn/attribute-release
>
> I favor that, though we do we want to just rename that from post-authn to
> intercept or interceptor?

Well, besides post-authn, is there another place in an SSO flow that
would be commonly called out to ? Personally, I like post-authn
because it makes it obvious when those flows are called. Maybe we
would never have pre-authn flows, but I guess my thought is that we
could have interceptor flows called at more than one point in an SSO
flow. It's not a strong opinion.