Consent Wording

Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at osu.edu
Fri Nov 21 09:57:39 EST 2014


On 11/21/14, 11:58 AM, "Lukas Hämmerle" <lukas.haemmerle at switch.ch> wrote:

>> +idp.attribute-release.rejectMessage                = If you decline
>>
>The word "requester" sounds a bit too technically (and is as Tom noted
>not entirely correct either) given that this message is intended for
>end-users. How about:
>"If you decline to send your information to the service, you will ..."

It's gone now, so it doesn't matter. ;-)

>A requirement for this would of course be that the strings visible to
>end users could be outsourced to property files or similar.

They are.

> And I'm sure
>there exists services that could automate the translation process (with
>notifications) in case strings are added or changed.

I don't really follow the last part, I'm not aware of anything like that, 
and that's partly why I'm skeptical, I don't know how people would know 
unless we pester them every time we need them changed. That's just not 
practical of course.

-- Scott



More information about the dev mailing list