Impl package naming

[Rod Widdowson]

> I'm getting kind of tired
> of going back and forth. 

+1

> If I'm willing to do the work and clean up the
> bean files, should I do that, maybe this weekend?

That would be great from my point of view.  Thanks for offering to do this.

> I have a preference for the OpenSAML naming, as it takes a package of APIs
> and adds impl to the end, which is kind of what you'd expect IMHO.

My general approach to naming is that I care a great deal about coherence
but will happily abstain on the actual choice of words (with the usual
understanding that this denies me the right to whine if I don't like the
outcome). 

/Rod