Impl package naming

[Ian Young]

On 31 Mar 2014, at 16:08, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> It's obviously a disruptive change to fix, but I'm getting kind of tired
> of going back and forth. If I'm willing to do the work and clean up the
> bean files, should I do that, maybe this weekend?

Yes.

> I have a preference for the OpenSAML naming, as it takes a package of APIs
> and adds impl to the end, which is kind of what you'd expect IMHO.

I agree, I think, although like Rod I think consistency is the important thing, not the convention. Moving to the OpenSAML one should be less disruptive, too, because of the layering.

	-- Ian



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5943 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140331/c74209ff/attachment-0001.bin