In-memory LDAP part of install?

[Tom Zeller]

> I think the answer's no, though we discussed it a bit. We probably
> shouldn't ship with files that need to connect to 10389 if we don't have
> it running.
>
> If it's a quick thing to get that running as part of the alpha, I'm ok
> with that, otherwise we should probably comment things out, particularly
> in the resolver, and just use a static connector like V2.

Funny, this was the tweak I just mentioned I was going to make to the
testbed. Currently, the testbed and integration tests launch the
in-memory LDAP server via code, previously, the in-memory LDAP was
launched via a Spring bean in the testbed's web.xml. That is what I
want to go back to, so that someone could run the IdP + testbed via
the integration tests project from the CLI.

So, yes, I think it's a quick thing. But, the in-memory LDAP is not
part of the IdP install, but rather the testbed. Is that okay ?