Do we think that it might be an idea to add the PRC to the Script engine context

[Tom Zeller]

> On Jul 28, 2014, at 10:37 AM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/28/14, 11:09 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>> 
>> In looking at the ScriptedAttributeDefinition I see that in that case we
>> only make the AttributeRequestContext and the AttributeRequestWorkContext
>> available.  This is unsurprisingly since this code happened before it
>> became
>> obvious that the PRC was the go-to context.
>> 
>> So, do we want to add the PRC as a name variable that the Attribute
>> resolution and filtering scripts can take advantage of?
> 
> Yeah, I think that should be a common factor.

+1