Do we think that it might be an idea to add the PRC to the Script engine context

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/28/14, 11:09 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>In looking at the ScriptedAttributeDefinition I see that in that case we
>only make the AttributeRequestContext and the AttributeRequestWorkContext
>available.  This is unsurprisingly since this code happened before it
>became
>obvious that the PRC was the go-to context.
>
>So, do we want to add the PRC as a name variable that the Attribute
>resolution and filtering scripts can take advantage of?

Yeah, I think that should be a common factor.

-- Scott