Status of replacement of svn:externals

[Ian Young]

On 14 Jan 2014, at 16:00, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> The only reason I didn't was because of all the others, don't feel
> strongly about it.
> 
> I also obviously left the checkstyle model we're using alone, the configs
> still point into svn. I think we might want to change that also, but it's
> not as pressing, and I imagine we're less likely to want different
> settings there (and it's not causing the problems the externals were/will).

Agreed, not as pressing. The weird checkstyle thing, where it needs HTTP access to the svn repository in order to validate stuff, seems like the top of the list in terms of importance, but it can wait.

	-- Ian



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5943 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140114/d4731eff/attachment-0001.bin