Shib on Tomcat 7 (and 8)
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Tue Oct 1 19:20:42 EDT 2013
On 10/1/13 4:31 PM, "Michael A Grady" <mgrady at unicon.net> wrote:
>I know that Unicon already has a signed SLA with Internet2, is there
>anything more that would be needed to contribute this to the project?
No, but if the code were being contributed under those terms, it would
need to formally packaged up and submitted along with a statement to that
effect, via Jira usually. Otherwise it can be Apache licensed and posted
anywhere.
> Does the project want to move this to their own repository? And once we
>know where to
> point to the jar, I assume you'd have no objections if we update the
>appropriate Shib wiki page for Tomcat?
I haven't seen any other feedback, so I imagine we'll discuss on Friday
unless there's agreement before then.
>p.s. do you need us to add anything more explicit as far as an open
>source license?
If you want to contribute under the SLA, no, not really. If you want to
just make it available on Apache terms, then you don't really need the
SLA, it just has to be licensed under Apache.
The purpose of the SLA is for patches and other contributions to be made
without a formal license.
> The source files themselves contain the standard UCAID license header.
That's what we're still using for the time being.
-- Scott
More information about the dev
mailing list