Ex: Re: NameID Format/Policy help

[Paul B. Henson]

> From: Cantor, Scott
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 4:28 AM
> 
> Peter's referring to the legacy Shibboleth format we used for transient IDs when
> we created the concept to support attribute query usage. That one is entirely
> outdated.

Ah, my bad; history I was unaware of.

> As I have mentioned recently in some conversations, if I had realized that
> everybody was going to have more trouble with us reusing old constants from
> SAML 1 vs. just creating all new ones that meant the same thing, I wouldn't
> have done it.

Yep, I was just making a general assumption that SAML 2 did make use of name id's from earlier versions of the specification, sorry...