sp rpm for Rocky 9

[Cantor, Scott]

> For better or worse, for things that aren't clearly a "must be
> fixed" bug, I generally do a run by on the mailing list first to
> avoid cluttering the bug database with a bunch of NOTABUG
> or WONTFIX issues… 

We need them tracked even then, or people will just file duplicates. FWIW, I didn't realize it was just a dependency issue, I thought it was the same bug as the Amazon packages had.

> I'm not sure what you mean? I was looking at the spec file
> included in  the srpm package, which unless you are doing
> something really weird is  by definition the one used to
> create the rpm package…

No, I thought you meant the one in the sources.

-- Scott