custom entityID

[Les LaCroix]

Surely, if I'm not aware of a feature, it must be obscure.  (just kidding)

I think, though, I'm pretty happy that I haven't had the need to
override responderId yet.


<http://www.carleton.edu/>

*Les LaCroix '79*

Strategic Technologist

Information Technology Services

t: (507) 222-5455


On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:55 PM Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> On 8/6/20, 1:38 PM, "users on behalf of Les LaCroix" <
> users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of llacroix at carleton.edu> wrote:
>
> >    Last resort for me would be to run a completely separate SAML
> provider.
>
> I'm not sure I buy the value of running a second IdP instead of adding
>
> p:responderId="secondentityid"
>
> to a file.
>
> I entirely agree it's a bad thing to agree to, but not because it's hard.
> It's one of the least invasive "bad idea" changes I could think of in fact,
> and it's certainly not obscure.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> --
> For Consortium Member technical support, see
> https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/coFAAg
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20200806/22a38a8a/attachment.htm>