llacroix at carleton.edu
Thu Aug 6 18:18:46 UTC 2020
Surely, if I'm not aware of a feature, it must be obscure. (just kidding)
I think, though, I'm pretty happy that I haven't had the need to
override responderId yet.
*Les LaCroix '79*
Information Technology Services
t: (507) 222-5455
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:55 PM Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> On 8/6/20, 1:38 PM, "users on behalf of Les LaCroix" <
> users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of llacroix at carleton.edu> wrote:
> > Last resort for me would be to run a completely separate SAML
> I'm not sure I buy the value of running a second IdP instead of adding
> to a file.
> I entirely agree it's a bad thing to agree to, but not because it's hard.
> It's one of the least invasive "bad idea" changes I could think of in fact,
> and it's certainly not obscure.
> -- Scott
> For Consortium Member technical support, see
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users