lohrda at jmu.edu
Thu Aug 6 17:58:14 UTC 2020
Thanks, preaching to the choir.
On 8/6/20 1:55 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> On 8/6/20, 1:38 PM, "users on behalf of Les LaCroix" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of llacroix at carleton.edu> wrote:
>> Last resort for me would be to run a completely separate SAML provider.
> I'm not sure I buy the value of running a second IdP instead of adding
> to a file.
> I entirely agree it's a bad thing to agree to, but not because it's hard. It's one of the least invasive "bad idea" changes I could think of in fact, and it's certainly not obscure.
> -- Scott
D o n a l d L o h r
I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m s
J a m e s M a d i s o n U n i v e r s i t y
5 4 0 . 5 6 8 . 3 7 3 0
More information about the users