custom entityID

Donald Lohr lohrda at
Thu Aug 6 17:58:14 UTC 2020

Thanks, preaching to the choir.

On 8/6/20 1:55 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> On 8/6/20, 1:38 PM, "users on behalf of Les LaCroix" <users-bounces at on behalf of llacroix at> wrote:
>>     Last resort for me would be to run a completely separate SAML provider.
> I'm not sure I buy the value of running a second IdP instead of adding
> p:responderId="secondentityid"
> to a file.
> I entirely agree it's a bad thing to agree to, but not because it's hard. It's one of the least invasive "bad idea" changes I could think of in fact, and it's certainly not obscure.
> -- Scott

D o n a l d   L o h r
I n f o r m a t i o n   S y s t e m s
J a m e s   M a d i s o n   U n i v e r s i t y
5 4 0 . 5 6 8 . 3 7 3 0

More information about the users mailing list