custom entityID
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Thu Aug 6 17:55:29 UTC 2020
On 8/6/20, 1:38 PM, "users on behalf of Les LaCroix" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of llacroix at carleton.edu> wrote:
> Last resort for me would be to run a completely separate SAML provider.
I'm not sure I buy the value of running a second IdP instead of adding
p:responderId="secondentityid"
to a file.
I entirely agree it's a bad thing to agree to, but not because it's hard. It's one of the least invasive "bad idea" changes I could think of in fact, and it's certainly not obscure.
-- Scott
More information about the users
mailing list