Ex: RE: new idp 4 Attribute Registry
Paul B. Henson
henson at cpp.edu
Thu Apr 23 17:40:02 EDT 2020
> From: Rod Widdowson
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 12:45 AM
> If you are doing it for a specific SP then that means you are probably going to
> use an activation condition on the encoder, in which
Well, oddly enough, there seem to be a number of SP's that think "Email" is the thing to call email, and "First_Name"/"Last_Name" are the standard name attributes 8-/. I dunno, at this point I just have the attributes defined, they don't conflict with anything else, I'm not sure if it would be more efficient to have to check the activation conditions for everything that doesn't need them or to just have them defined for places that don't need them?
> If you want to do it the new way (either in XML or in a properties file) then
> the name you want is "saml2.friendlyName"
Ah, cool; thanks for the pointer, I didn't see that.
More information about the users