testing errors

[Peter Schober]

* Tom Scavo <trscavo at gmail.com> [2018-01-15 19:16]:
> > I honestly think TestShib is just way too crucial for SAML as a whole
> > to let it degrade as a service or become a members-only thing
> 
> Nate, I completely agree with you. TestShib is definitely NOT a
> members-only thing. Even the name "TestShib" undercuts its true
> potential value, which goes way beyond any particular brand of
> software.
> 
> (Peter, I am pushing back on the members-only idea. I hope you
> understand I'm not pushing back on you personally.)

No offence taken. My suggestion doesn't even reflect my own
convictions (which don't including /anything/ members-only), which
probably explains why I suck at determining where to draw the line.

This was merely a (possibly flawed) suggestion to potentially increase
the sustainability of the testshib service, given that -- as Nate
claims and I'm sure is correct -- it's so essential to so many
people/companies.  I.e, if that's the case maybe those users should be
given the opportinty to contribute to its availability.
Maybe a donate button would do.
Maybe just ignore me talking about funding.

-peter