Shibboleth SP clustering using shared database
wlee007-m at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 20 15:31:13 EST 2018
Our application is mainly stateless and the only stateful part we use RP to maintain stickiness, I would consider the application is clustered. But our application does rely on SP for the authenticated user id (REMOTE_USER) and session management, these are the other reasons we want to cluster SP.
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018, 3:13:57 PM EST, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> Well, we want to "cluster" (load balancing, round robin) the Apache httpd RP
> (reverse proxy) nodes, since SP tights to the RP, it needs to be clustered with
> shared storageservice.
If the application isn't clustered it doesn't matter and if it is it almost certainly doesn't need the SP session, so there is no point in clustering it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users