<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;"><div>Our application is mainly stateless and the only stateful part we use RP to maintain stickiness, I would consider the application is clustered. But our application does rely on SP for the authenticated user id (REMOTE_USER) and session management, these are the other reasons we want to cluster SP.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>William</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div id="ydpb2c1fd2yahoo_quoted_9858544563" class="ydpb2c1fd2yahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018, 3:13:57 PM EST, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div dir="ltr">> Well, we want to "cluster" (load balancing, round robin) the Apache httpd RP<br clear="none">> (reverse proxy) nodes, since SP tights to the RP, it needs to be clustered with<br clear="none">> shared storageservice.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">If the application isn't clustered it doesn't matter and if it is it almost certainly doesn't need the SP session, so there is no point in clustering it.<div class="ydpb2c1fd2yqt1021032895" id="ydpb2c1fd2yqtfd74235"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">-- Scott<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>