Need input on the approaches for ESO implementation

[Peter Schober]

* bhupendra.a.singh at accenture.com <bhupendra.a.singh at accenture.com> [2017-06-29 06:23]:
> We have a requirement to install the apache webserver in different
> Linux box then the shibboleth and the application server.

Because? (As presented that doesn't make any sense.)

> Please help me to understand, from the below two approachs which one
> is best suitable for our requirement.

You've already answered that by stating that your /requirement/ is
approach 1 (not that I think that requirement is sensible).
So what is your question, really?

Approach 1 makes no sense, as the "Shibboleth" you install *is* part
of the Apache httpd webserver (at one part of it; and I doubt there
can be sane reasons for putting the other part on another machine).

> If I will installed the Apache server in different box then
> shibboleth, how shib.conf file will be generated in the
> httpd->conf.d-shib.conf  location which is required for shibboleth
> integration with Apache.

You're already realising yourself that having a module for httpd be
"on another server" than httpd itself makes no sense.

Why don't you start at the beginning, by describing the kind of
application server you're trying to protect (be specific), and not in
the mid of some requirement discussion that already presupposes
implementation details.

-peter