Windows SP 2.6.0

[Cantor, Scott]

On 6/9/17, 2:26 PM, "users on behalf of Young, Darren" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of Darren.Young at chicagobooth.edu> wrote:

>64-bit, 16GB RAM, 8 CPU¹s.

I don't have enough "real" SPs around anymore to really benchmark much of anything, and my Windows access borders on non-existent at any scale needed to measure this kind of thing. I would be fairly shocked at that kind of performance on a box like that, but shocked doesn't mean I have any reason to dispute it if others are seeing similar.

If not, I can't imagine what would be interfering with it, it seems bottlenecked where I'd expect.

Best bet is just to flip the setting to avoid verifying the backup file I suspect. It's still going to churn hard every day reloading it, but that should at least be a background thread.
 
-- Scott