Attribute-Filter afp?

[Samuel James]

Thank you :)

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Klingenstein, Nate <
nklingenstein at calstate.edu> wrote:

> Samuel,
>
>
>
> XML namespace use (afp: and so forth) was eradicated to the point possible
> in v3.  The old format will generally still work.
>
>
>
> The “why” is why you’re asking: it was confusing for users to have
> multiple different XML namespaces used in that way, so it was flattened.
>
>
>
> Take care,
>
> Nate.
>
>
>
> *From:* users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] *On Behalf Of *Samuel
> James
> *Sent:* Monday, January 30, 2017 11:43 AM
> *To:* users at shibboleth.net
> *Subject:* Attribute-Filter afp?
>
>
>
> I have read the online docs -- but it hasn't sunk in and hoping someone
> could explain.
>
>
>
> We are looking after 2 Shibboleth instances -- why does old (v2) have
> 'afp' in the attribute filter -- does it matter that the new V3 does not?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The legacy V2:
>
>
>
> <afp:AttributeRule attributeID="mail">
>
>             <afp:PermitValueRule xsi:type="basic:ANY"/>
>
>         </afp:AttributeRule>
>
>
>
> The new Shibboleth v3:
>
>         <AttributeRule attributeID="mail">
>
>             <PermitValueRule xsi:type="ANY" />
>
>         </AttributeRule>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20170130/c316b608/attachment-0001.html>