activactionCondition question

[Cantor, Scott]

On 9/23/16, 8:17 AM, "users on behalf of Greg Kuchyt" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of gkuchyt at uvm.edu> wrote:

>    Ok thanks. I misunderstood the docs as I read them. This clears up some of the
> confusion I was having with this.

You didn't misunderstand what's possible, you're just conflating "can" with "should". You can make the IdP behave in awful ways, but that doesn't make it a good idea.

-- Scott