Namespace does not seem to include FilterElement
Rod Widdowson
rdw at steadingsoftware.com
Thu Mar 31 10:28:08 EDT 2016
I just refreshed IDP-858 to refer to this
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor,
Scott
> Sent: 30 March 2016 15:11
> To: Shib Users
> Subject: Re: Namespace does not seem to include FilterElement
>
> On 3/30/16, 10:08 AM, "users on behalf of Rod Widdowson" <users-
> bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Well, we changed the names in some cases in the filter plugins.
> >
> >I'm quite happy to re-investigate this for 3.3 To my mind the namespace
> >flattening in the filters was one of the biggest ease of use wins in
3.2...
>
> Well, for myself, I definitely would like to get rid of the namespaces,
but I think
> the big win in the resolver is the ordering mess.
>
> I suspect the problem was that we were focusing on these two issues
> separately. If you don't change the namespaces, I think it's too hard to
fix the
> ordering "in place" in the schema, because the elements were spread across
> multiple namespaces. Fixing both at once should be very possible, because
the
> new xsi:types are fundamentally not the same types as before.
>
> -- Scott
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-
> unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
More information about the users
mailing list