PolicyRequirementRule 3.x vs. 2.x

[Dave Bartholomew]

Thanks for the pointer in the right direction. I was defaulting to afp,
but therefore needed the "basic:" added to my "Rule."

-- Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor,
Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:47 PM
To: Shib Users
Subject: RE: PolicyRequirementRule 3.x vs. 2.x

> I have a Shib 3.2.1 (new style) PolicyRequirementRule that works:

The new style is a collapsed grammar that lives in one namespace. It still
requires that be declared, though, which you must have done.

> And a similar one in 2.x that doesn't work:

And the old one has at least 3 namespaces all mixed. You left out a
default namespace, basically, and you're trying to use namespace-less
elements, I would imagine.

-- Scott

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net