template attribute definition possible bug?

[Athanasios Douitsis]

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> Hmm. I'll have to see what the dependency pulling code is doing on a
> non-existent attribute ID. Perhaps that is the bug. And of course if you
> have a dependency with only a subset of the attributes in it, that would be
> equivalent. I didn't follow your meaning, now I think I do.
>
> >I totally respect that you are not going to deal with idp2 or openjdk for
> that matter.
>
> I wasn't going to look just to review how the code worked, but now that I
> have a specific thing to check it for, that's fine. Or Brent will look at
> it later.
>
> The above just can't be right, so I suggest you file a bug.
>

Thanks, will do. Considering that I get the same erroneous behaviour when
using actual existing IDs as source attributes, your speculation about the
partial attributes seems plausible. But keep in mind that I used Rod's
example verbatim and I still got the error.

Kind regards,
-- 
Athanasios Douitsis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20151103/a520d7c3/attachment.html>