Metadata Changeover Questions

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/22/15, 11:27 AM, "users on behalf of McKean, Brandon Scott - mckeanbs" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of mckeanbs at jmu.edu> wrote:



>In that case, I suspect the next step would be to publish the current metadata to InCommon. That is, the one with both SAML1 and SAML2 support. That shouldn't break anything provided I
> include support for all protocols that are currently listed, right?

It will break any SP that is not properly configured to immediately support, migrate to, and seamlessly adapt to, use of SAML 2.

That set could be empty, a few, a dozen, or a lot. Probably "a few".

-- Scott