Windows SP Performance

[Young, Darren]

No, it¹s a standalone machine but it's behind an F5 SSL front-end (no
HTTPS re-proxy/re-encrypt). We¹d like to add a second server at some point
(hence the F5) but are working things out with a single server to start
with.

We expect load to necessitate the second server at some point but not
immediately.

Darren Young
Systems & Security Architect
Information Technology
The University of Chicago
Booth School of Business
5807 South Woodlawn Ave
Chicago, Illinois 60637
Tel: 773.702.0331
www.ChicagoBooth.edu <http://www.chicagobooth.edu/>

-------------------------------
Get the latest Booth Thinking
 <http://www.facebook.com/booththinking>
<http://twitter.com/BoothThinking> <http://youtube.com/booththinking>





On 2/4/15, 10:41 AM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

>> We are in the midst of deploying all of our apps under the Windows/IIS
>>SP
>> and believe we are having performance impact from the SP. We have looked
>> through all other areas of our apps but need someone to assist
>> troubleshooting the SP. We are looking for someone, perhaps one of the
>>SP
>> authors, or someone that has experience with the IIS SP, to assist with
>>this. If
>> you are interested, please contact me off list.
>
>Before you spend any significant time looking, are you clustering it, and
>if so, how? Because if the answer is that you're remoting access to a
>shibd daemon on some other box, that's your problem.
>
>-- Scott
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net