Reasons to use/not use HTML local storage?

[Wessel, Keith]

Ah, got it. So, while the HTML local storage can help with session storage, the main goal was for client-side consent storage.

But there's no way to use HTML local storage just for consent and not for sessions, right? That is cookies for sessions and HTML local (where available) for consent?

Keith


-----Original Message-----
From: users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 7:48 PM
To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
Subject: Re: Reasons to use/not use HTML local storage?

On 11/30/15, 6:03 PM, "users on behalf of Wessel, Keith" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:



> And all of this to gain the use of SAML Logout which only gives me one desired feature: the ability for an SP to request control back to their own after logout page with the asynchronous logout functionality. Not sure it's worth it.

But the topic here is really local storage. The main purpose of that is storing consent records, not logout.

-- Scott

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net