SP memcache plugin problem

Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at osu.edu
Tue Mar 4 13:53:21 EST 2014


On 3/4/14, 1:37 PM, "jacob at collegenet.com" <jacob at collegenet.com> wrote:

>The OP said, "login fails and we receive error," which sounds like just
>what you describe above.

Possibly, but the failing call was a read. That might have been a replay
cache lookup though.

>Personally I think that's a show-stopper for using the current SP
>memcached implementation.
>The use of memcached should not in any case make the SP return errors
>where it wouldn't if it
>were a non-clustered instance.

That property isn't specific to this plugin, the storage code would have
to be more complex and be doing a local store and then pushing to a remote
store to make that work.

Generally, the best thing is to see how you're clustering the app in the
absence of the SP, and then see if the SP's even involved at that point.
It's not realistic to try and compete with the kinds of session
capabilities that application servers supposedly have. But of course most
of them work about as well as this does.

-- Scott




More information about the users mailing list