SP memcache plugin problem

[Cantor, Scott]

On 3/4/14, 12:47 PM, "jacob at collegenet.com" <jacob at collegenet.com> wrote:

>
>So if the original poster's login failure is repeatable, that would be an
>unexpected result?  (You may have guessed but I have been considering
>using the memcached store for our SP so I have some beyond-academic
>interest in this discussion.)

I didn't necessarily grasp what the OP was asking about beyond "why is
this error in the log?", so I would have to defer to a follow up there.

That's not universally true...if you process a response and it can't write
the new session to the cache, no, that's not going to be graceful. It
can't do anything but fail.

But if it's looking up a session, no, it shouldn't fail to my
recollection, it should consider it a missing session and act as though
there isn't one, whatever that leads to.

But there are other fatal cases, like using storage for relay state.

-- Scott