Shib SP using isPassive without lazy sessions

[Wessel, Keith]

Thanks, Scott and Chris. This clarifies things.

Keith


-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:36 PM
To: Shib Users
Subject: Re: Shib SP using isPassive without lazy sessions

On 7/23/14, 1:10 PM, "Wessel, Keith" <kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:

>Thanks, Scott. I suspected as much. So, the logical follow-up question 
>is when would someone use shibRequestSetting isPassive on if all it's 
>going to get you back is an SAML exception?

You'd rarely combine it with requireSession, but if you did it, redirected errors to a separate page, and then programmed that page to issue a second request without it, or directed the client somewhere else, that might be a reason.

-- Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net