Shib SP using isPassive without lazy sessions

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/23/14, 1:10 PM, "Wessel, Keith" <kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:

>Thanks, Scott. I suspected as much. So, the logical follow-up question is
>when would someone use shibRequestSetting isPassive on if all it's going
>to get you back is an SAML exception?

You'd rarely combine it with requireSession, but if you did it, redirected
errors to a separate page, and then programmed that page to issue a second
request without it, or directed the client somewhere else, that might be a
reason.

-- Scott