ServiceNow Multi-Provider SSO integration follow-up

[Mark K. Miller]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Cantor, Scott wrote:

> On 7/11/14, 12:28 AM, "David Langenberg" <davel at uchicago.edu> wrote:
>>
>> No, it's not hard at all, but not having to send a custom NameID cuts
>> down on the number of custom relying-party entries in my
>> relying-party.xml.  A worthy rock to trip over so long as Service-Now
>> views this as a feature rather than a bug.
>
> You need one anyway, to turn off encryption,

So, let's get them to support encryption like so many other reasonable 
vendors do with their SPs, and NOT have everyone making a custom 
relying-party.

Max

>                                              and you don't need a custom
> one to handle a NameID, just add it to metadata.
>
> -- Scott
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>