ServiceNow Multi-Provider SSO integration follow-up

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/11/14, 12:28 AM, "David Langenberg" <davel at uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
>No, it's not hard at all, but not having to send a custom NameID cuts
>down on the number of custom relying-party entries in my
>relying-party.xml.  A worthy rock to trip over so long as Service-Now
>views this as a feature rather than a bug.

You need one anyway, to turn off encryption, and you don't need a custom
one to handle a NameID, just add it to metadata.

-- Scott