ISAPPI 32 and 64-bit versions

[Walden H. Leverich]

>Officially, I don't certify mixing shibd and DLL versions...

Just curious why not. Isn't the communication channel between the app pool (where isapi_dll is loaded) and the shibd service a simple tcp connection? Isn't that like not certifying using 32bit FireFox with 64bit Apache? :-)

If the answer is that while it should work, it's not a tested config I get that, cool. Just wondering if there's something more.

-Walden

--
Walden H Leverich III
(516) 627-3800 x3051
WaldenL at TechSoftInc.com<mailto:WaldenL at TechSoftInc.com>


From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:42 PM
To: Shib Users
Subject: Re: ISAPPI 32 and 64-bit versions

On 12/19/14, 10:58 PM, "IAM David Bantz" <dabantz at alaska.edu><mailto:dabantz at alaska.edu%3e> wrote:
>
>Does this simple expedient seem appropriate? If so, installing both the
>32 and 64 bit isapi_dll versions to start would seem to be cheap
>insurance against encountering a similar future anomaly.

They are both installed, you can't get the 64-bit version now without it
installing both sets of files. Officially, I don't certify mixing shibd
and DLL versions so running both at the same time was unsupported.
Supposedly it works fine and doesn't matter which shibd version is used,
but it's a bad idea to run only one of them and not run the consistent
variant of shibd.

-- Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net<mailto:users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net>

________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20141221/0187d80f/attachment.html