<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">></span>Officially, I don't certify mixing shibd and DLL versions...<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Just curious why not. Isn’t the communication channel between the app pool (where isapi_dll is loaded) and the shibd service a simple tcp connection? Isn’t that
like not certifying using 32bit FireFox with 64bit Apache? :-) <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">If the answer is that while it
<i>should</i> work, it’s not a tested config I get that, cool. Just wondering if there’s something more.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">-Walden<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">--
<br>
Walden H Leverich III<br>
(516) 627-3800 x3051<br>
<a href="mailto:WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com">WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com</a><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> users-bounces@shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces@shibboleth.net]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Cantor, Scott<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, December 19, 2014 6:42 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Shib Users<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: ISAPPI 32 and 64-bit versions<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 12/19/14, 10:58 PM, "IAM David Bantz" <<a href="mailto:dabantz@alaska.edu%3e">dabantz@alaska.edu></a> wrote:<br>
><br>
>Does this simple expedient seem appropriate? If so, installing both the <br>
>32 and 64 bit isapi_dll versions to start would seem to be cheap <br>
>insurance against encountering a similar future anomaly.<br>
<br>
They are both installed, you can't get the 64-bit version now without it <br>
installing both sets of files. Officially, I don't certify mixing shibd <br>
and DLL versions so running both at the same time was unsupported. <br>
Supposedly it works fine and doesn't matter which shibd version is used, <br>
but it's a bad idea to run only one of them and not run the consistent <br>
variant of shibd.<br>
<br>
-- Scott<br>
<br>
-- <br>
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to <a href="mailto:users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net">
users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net</a><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
</body>
</html>