servicenow SAML 2 integration
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Wed Apr 30 19:44:09 EDT 2014
On 4/30/14, 7:24 PM, "Paul B. Henson" <henson at csupomona.edu> wrote:
>
>Hmm, perhaps your definition of "special" differs from mine ;). So far it
>looks like servicenow requires a special relying-party definition
>disabling attribute encryption, a special attribute encoding your ID
>attribute of choice as a name-id, and a special exclusion of the default
>transientId.
The latter hasn't been required for a while, you can specify NameID
formats in metadata or in the RelyingParty element in a precedence list.
-- Scott
More information about the users
mailing list