servicenow SAML 2 integration

Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at
Wed Apr 30 19:44:09 EDT 2014

On 4/30/14, 7:24 PM, "Paul B. Henson" <henson at> wrote:
>Hmm, perhaps your definition of "special" differs from mine ;). So far it
>looks like servicenow requires a special relying-party definition
>disabling attribute encryption, a special attribute encoding your ID
>attribute of choice as a name-id, and a special exclusion of the default

The latter hasn't been required for a while, you can specify NameID
formats in metadata or in the RelyingParty element in a precedence list.

-- Scott

More information about the users mailing list