R&S surName vs sn

[Tom Scavo]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Tompkins,Charles R <crt at ufl.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I don't believe the value of 'attributeID' matters as long as it's
>> consistent in the IdP's configuration. (On the wire, the name of the
>> attribute is actually based on an opaque OID.)
>
> Thanks Tom.  I have already defined "sn" so I will go with that.  It
> threw me off to have the others line up except that one.

Sounds like the Shib IdP uses the "sn" notation out of the box so I
should probably align the documentation with that. (Curious that it
uses "email" rather than "mail" tho.)

Thanks,
Tom