Problems trying to compile log4shib

[Jose Lopez Lujan]

Hi all,

I finally have compiled and installed log4shib for SPARC 64bit:

liblog4shib.so: ELF 64-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARCV9 Version 1, dynamically
linked, not stripped
liblog4shib.so.1:       ELF 64-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARCV9 Version 1,
dynamically linked, not stripped
liblog4shib.so.1.0.4:   ELF 64-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARCV9 Version 1,
dynamically linked, not stripped

What I've done is downloaded the latest version of log4cpp, run the
configuration script using the same options as if log4shib. Run the
log4shib configuration script and replaced libtool file by log4cpp's which
is using a newer version of libtool:

src/log4shib-1.0.4> ./libtool-old --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.2 (1.1220.2.60 2004/01/25 12:25:08)
Copyright (C) 2003  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

src/log4shib-1.0.4> ./libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.24 (1.1220.2.456 2007/06/24 02:25:32)
Copyright (C) 2007  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.



Once done that, I've just run make, make install and was very straight
forward. Why I did it this way? Because as per of my knowledge log4shib is
a forked version of log4cpp and theoretically the basis is the same.

I strongly believe, as Scott does, that there are some issues with
log4shib's libtool version.

Thank you all for your help.

Best,
-
Jose Manuel Lopez Lujan
Senior LMS  Coordinator
University of Toronto





On 12-01-16 9:09 AM, "Jose Lopez Lujan" <jm.lopez at utoronto.ca> wrote:

>Hi Scott, 
>
>Thanks for your help. I'll definitely try that, makes a lot of sense,
>because in fact I read a couple of sources highlighting libtool issues.
>
>I'll keep you posted and thanks again.
>
>Best,
>-
>Jose Manuel Lopez Lujan
>Senior LMS  Coordinator
>University of Toronto
>
>
>
>
>
>On 12-01-13 5:29 PM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
>
>>I refreshed my memory using my test host, and it's definitely the case
>>that Solaris builds 32-bit by default even when the kernel is 64, not as
>>I
>>remembered.
>>
>>So I would guess that a 64-bit build hasn't really been attempted widely
>>and you're perhaps running into libtool bugs in that area. If you're dead
>>set on Solaris (I'd reconsider, your time is probably worth something to
>>you and Linux just works) and 64-bit, you may need to try regenerating
>>the
>>autotools and libtool files from scratch on the host using the latest
>>autotools and libtool. It might work. If there's a specific bug in
>>libtool
>>we can identify, then it becomes a matter of determining if I can
>>generate
>>future tarballs using a fixed version.
>>
>>-- Scott
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>>users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net